Says Who?
Shahid Masood
Shahid Masood sees subtlety not as a virtue but as a weakness of will. He has made little attempt to hide his opposition to Asif Zardari and preference for Nawaz Sharif on his talk show, Meray Mutabiq. This despite his previous involvement with the PPP. While such overt displays of bias are regrettable, talk-show hosts in Pakistan are expected, even encouraged by their viewers, to be identified with certain agendas and political preferences.
In a column on his recent visit to Washington DC, Masood crossed the line from advocacy to unprofessionalism. Masood sees a change brewing in the US government’s attitude towards the Zardari government and he is eager to document this supposed policy shift. In doing so, however, he quotes “one official on background”, “many officials”, “an agitated official” and “another official”, all of whom were “top Americans.” In addition, Masood met with “several informed US and Pakistani officials” and “a Pakistani who knows a lot about developments in Pakistan and the US scene.”
See the problem here? Masood managed to craft an entire story without getting a single person to speak on the record. And while this may be one of the most extreme examples I have of the use of anonymous sources, it is an affliction that ails most Pakistani journalism.
The use of anonymous sources, especially when they conform to the journalist’s biases, should raise suspicion. We have no idea what prejudices these particular officials may have, or even if they have any influence on Pakistan policy. For all we know they may just be the musings of a low-level functionary. As such, this casual granting of anonymity does less to inform the public than help various actors advance their agendas without the responsibility that comes from having your name attached to a statement.
If using anonymous sources to put your own point of view across while keeping up the charade of impartiality is pernicious, there is another kind of anonymity that betrays nothing but laziness. The “Pakistani who knows a lot about developments in Pakistan and the US scene” is quoted for no other reason than to state how Zardari could find himself out of power, namely resignation, an army coup, impeachment or the elimination of the president either by natural or “man-made” causes. Were I to ask a 10-year-old child to list the various ways any political leader might be removed from power, I would expect him to make the same obvious list. This serves only to pad an already sketchy story with another pointless quote.
The protection afforded by anonymity should be given sparingly. It is appropriate when whistle blowers are giving vital information – government corruption, for example – that would cause them to lose their jobs, or even their lives. This shield should certainly not be proffered to allow others to advance their agendas – no matter how much you might agree with them.
The opinions expressed in this article and the views shared by readers in the comment forum below do not necessarily reflect the editorial stance or policies of Newsline.
Share this post:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Excellent post Nadir
Dont push this Dr-cum-PPP jiala-cum-Journalist for sources he’ll get his pal Hameed Gul to say whatever he wants.
[...] UPDATE: On the subject of Geo, anonymous sources and irresponsible “journalism”, check out the Water Cooler on Shahid Masood. [...]
thanks. this was begged to be said. good stuff.
Good one Mr Nadir….It is really unfortunate that we have journalists like him who are taken seriously and their opinions pollute millions of minds daily
Follow Us
Search by Keyword
Search by Author
Powered by Authors WidgetLatest Poll
Will Pakistan win the third Test match against England and secure the "clean sweep" in the series?
Total Voters: 61
Blogroll
Blog Row
Media Partners
Blogs from Pakistan and Around the World
Top Search Terms
Recent Comments
Most Read...